5.0 COST
Instrument Development Costs (FY94 $K) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase III | ||||||
Instrument | Phase I | Phase II | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Totals |
FUV Spectrographic Imager | 404.01 | 202.41 | 1116.09 | 736.65 | 799.56 | 3258.72 |
FUV Wideband Camera | 218.74 | 66.57 | 730.85 | 640.93 | 480.53 | 2137.62 |
EUV Imager | 203.94 | 173.25 | 835.56 | 1057.32 | 561.33 | 2831.40 |
NAI Imagers and Support | 1387.25 | 473.07 | 2425.06 | 2720.87 | 1971.50 | 8977.75 |
RPI | 198.00 | 177.00 | 1440.00 | 1161.00 | 324.00 | 3240.00 |
CIDP | 82.65 | 23.75 | 691.60 | 357.20 | 119.70 | 1274.90 |
Software | 23.75 | 9.50 | 242.25 | 137.75 | 45.60 | 458.85 |
Total in $K | 2518.34 | 1065.55 | 7481.41 | 6811.72 | 4302.22 | 22179.24 |
Instrument | Cost Justification |
---|---|
FUV Spectrographic Imager | ATLAS/AEPI, SOHO,TRACE |
FUV Wideband Camera | Rebuild of Viking and Freja UV imager |
EUV Imager | Intensifiers are copies from Viking imager. |
NAI | Imagers and SupportAMPTE/CHEM, Cassini/MIMI/CHEMs |
Polar/TIDE RPI | Flight-hardened version of existing DPS, antennas from ISEE & WIND |
CIDP | Similar to Spacelab/FES-VCGS, BMDO/MSTI-1 |
Software | Based on Polar/TIDE software |
5.0.1 Alternate Investigation Funding. If IMAGE is selected as an alternative mission, we will request funding of $225K (1-yr. program) or $450K (2-yr. program).
WBS Elements (Cost in FY94 $M) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Phase | Duration | Mgt QA 1.0 | Sci. Spt 2.0 | Sys Eng 3.0 | Inst Sys 4.0 | Inst I,T 5.0 | S/C I,T 6.0 | Mis Ops 7.0 | Mis Tds 8.0 | MODA 9.0 | Edu 10.0 | Totals |
Phase I | 10 mo. | 0.306 | 0.554 | 0.087 | 2.518 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 3.584 |
Phase I | 22 mo. | 0.406 | 0.654 | 0.137 | 2.668 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 3.984 |
Phase II | 3 mo. | 0.120 | 0.213 | 0.017 | 1.066 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.065 | 1.481 |
Phase III | Year 1 | 0.908 | 0.599 | 0.189 | 7.481 | 0 | 0 | 0.110 | 0 | 0 | 0.125 | 9.412 |
Phase III | Year 2 | 1.047 | 0.696 | 0.2102 | 6.815 | 0.075 | 0.100 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0.125 | 9.420 |
Phase III | Year 3 | 0.830 | 0.802 | 0.210 | 4.302 | 0.525 | 0.315 | 0.450 | 0 | 0 | 0.125 | 7.560 |
NASA Pre-launch cost | I (10 mo.) | 3.211 | 2.864 | 0.713 | 22.18 | 0.600 | 0.420 | 0.910 | 0 | 0 | 0.560 | 31.457 |
I (22 mo.) | 3.311 | 2.964 | 0.763 | 22.33 | 0.600 | 0.420 | 0.910 | 0 | 0 | 0.560 | 31.857 | |
Requested Reserves | 10 mo. Phase I | 6.038 | ||||||||||
22 mo. Phase I | 6.098 | |||||||||||
Total NASA Prelaunch Cost | 10 mo. Phase I | 37.495 | ||||||||||
22 mo. Phase I | 37.955 | |||||||||||
Foreign Contribution | Belgium | 1.50 | ||||||||||
Japan | 0.34 | |||||||||||
Total Investigation Cost | 10 mo. Phase I | 39.335 | ||||||||||
22 mo. Phase I | 39.795 | |||||||||||
MO&DA | ||||||||||||
Phase IV | Year 1 | 0.91 | 0.712 | 3.305 | 0.33 | 4.931 | ||||||
Year 2 | 0.84 | 0.712 | 3.175 | 0.33 | 4.727 | |||||||
Year 3 | 0.84 | 0.277 | 3.165 | 0.33 | 4.281 | |||||||
Total MODA Costs | 2.59 | 1.701 | 9.644 | 0.99 | 14.928 | |||||||
NASA-Provided Spacecraft | ||||||||||||
Spacecraft Cost | 10 mo. Phase I | 23.58 | ||||||||||
Spacecraft Reserves | 10 mo. Phase I | 5.95 | ||||||||||
Total | 10 mo. Phase I | 29.53 | ||||||||||
Spacecraft Cost | 22 mo. Phase I | 23.95 | ||||||||||
Spacecraft Reserves | 22 mo. Phase I | 6.00 | ||||||||||
Total | 22 mo. Phase I | 29.95 | ||||||||||
NOTES: The GSFC RAO independently estimated the cost of IMAGE instruments as $38.6M w/reserves (see memo to Dr. Mark Smith, 12 June 1995). An independent cost analysis of the image spacecraft by the GSFC RAO yielded a total cost of $28.4m w/reserves. Alternative mission costs are $225K (1 yr) or $450K (2 yr). |
5.0.2 Small and Small Disadvantaged Company Subcontracting. The IMAGE team is committed to meeting the subcontracting goals of the AO. We have identified three small businesses as subcontracting candidates: Spectrum Astro (SDB) for electronic packaging, Conceptual Mindworks (SDB) for software, and AEC-Able Engineering (SB) for the RPI antennas. We have worked with these three companies in the past with excellent results.