Observation of the electron and proton aurora from the IMAGE satellite: comparison with in-situ particle precipitation J.-Cl. G'erard (1), B. Hubert (1), M. Meurant (1), V. Coumans (1), S. Mende (2), H. Frey (2), V.I. Shematovich (3), D.V. Bisikalo (3), G. R. Gladstone (4), S. Habraken (5) 1 - LPAP, Universite de Liege, Belgium} 2 - SSL, University of California at Berkeley 3 - Institute of Astronomy, Moscow 4 - SWRI, San Antonio, Texas, USA 5 - CSL, Universite de Liege, Belgium The FUV instrument on the IMAGE satellite images the aurora in three different spectral regions. The Wideband Imaging Camera (WIC) observes the molecular N2 LBH and atomic nitrogen emissions at 140-190 nm. The two channels of the Spectrographic Imager (SI) observe the Doppler shifted Lyman-alpha emission of precipitating protons at 121.8 nm (SI12) and electron-produced emission from OI at 135.6 nm (SI13). Observations made with the WIC and the SI cameras make it thus possible to spectrally discriminate between the proton and electron FUV aurora. Data collected since early May 2000 show that all three instruments make very sensitive measurements with high spatial resolution even in the sunlit daytime cusp. It was demonstrated that the SI12 channel is capable for the first time to map the energetic protons. Observations show that electron and proton precipitations roughly overlap. However, images of the Doppler-shifted Lyman-alpha emission show clear morphological differences between the diffuse proton aurora and the more structured electron precipitation. Regions such as the pre-midnight low latitude sector where proton precipitation dominates may be separated from the electron component. Parallel in-situ observations of the precipitated particles have been collected from low-altitude satellites during IMAGE apogee observations of the North polar region. These simultaneous measurements permit a comparison between the remotely imaged particle precipitation and the magnetic footprint measurements made along the low-altitude satellite track. The local and global precipitated energy fluxes of both protons and electrons estimated from both types of observations will be compared as well as the precipitation boundaries. _______________ Presented at the European Geophysical Society meeting, Nice, France, March 30, 2001